Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An artificial neural network based approach for predicting the proton beam spot dosimetric characteristics of a pencil beam scanning technique.
Ranjith, C P; Krishnan, Mayakannan; Raveendran, Vysakh; Chaudhari, Lalit; Laskar, Siddhartha.
Affiliation
  • Ranjith CP; Department of Medical Physics, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, D. Y. Patil Education Society (Deemed to be University), Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India.
  • Krishnan M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
  • Raveendran V; Department of Medical Physics, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, D. Y. Patil Education Society (Deemed to be University), Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India.
  • Chaudhari L; Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
  • Laskar S; Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Biomed Phys Eng Express ; 10(3)2024 Apr 22.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38652667
ABSTRACT
Utilising Machine Learning (ML) models to predict dosimetric parameters in pencil beam scanning proton therapy presents a promising and practical approach. The study developed Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models to predict proton beam spot size and relative positional errors using 9000 proton spot data. The irradiation log files as input variables and corresponding scintillation detector measurements as the label values. The ANN models were developed to predict six variables spot size in thex-axis,y-axis, major axis, minor axis, and relative positional errors in thex-axis andy-axis. All ANN models used a Multi-layer perception (MLP) network using one input layer, three hidden layers, and one output layer. Model performance was validated using various statistical tools. The log file recorded spot size and relative positional errors, which were compared with scintillator-measured data. The Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) values for the x-spot and y-spot sizes were 0.356 mm and 0.362 mm, respectively. Additionally, the maximum variation for the x-spot relative positional error was 0.910 mm, while for the y-spot, it was 1.610 mm. The ANN models exhibit lower prediction errors. Specifically, the RMSE values for spot size prediction in the x, y, major, and minor axes are 0.053 mm, 0.049 mm, 0.053 mm, and 0.052 mm, respectively. Additionally, the relative spot positional error prediction model for the x and y axes yielded maximum errors of 0.160 mm and 0.170 mm, respectively. The normality of models was validated using the residual histogram and Q-Q plot. The data over fit, and bias were tested using K (k = 5) fold cross-validation, and the maximum RMSE value of the K fold cross-validation among all the six ML models was less than 0.150 mm (R-Square 0.960). All the models showed excellent prediction accuracy. Accurately predicting beam spot size and positional errors enhances efficiency in routine dosimetric checks.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiometry / Radiotherapy Dosage / Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted / Neural Networks, Computer / Proton Therapy Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Biomed Phys Eng Express Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiometry / Radiotherapy Dosage / Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted / Neural Networks, Computer / Proton Therapy Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Biomed Phys Eng Express Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: